Technology + Design = Apple?
I wanted to share this recent blog posting by John Maeda, President of the Rhode Island School of Design. John is an inspired thought leader on the subjects of innovation, design and technology.
A few months ago, I sat with John Sculley, the former CEO of Apple, who described Steve Jobs’ primary design principle: “Not what you can add, but what you can remove.” It reminded me of the first law I outlined in my book The Laws of Simplicity, that, “The simplest way to achieve simplicity is through thoughtful reduction.” This philosophy runs counter to a typical tech company’s approach, where the goal is always to upgrade and add as opposed to subtract. It’s true, for the consumer to pay more and get less defies conventional wisdom and seems to contradict economic principles. But simplified technology doesn’t necessarily mean less functionality.
Apple products aren’t simple technologies by any stretch, but there is a beautiful simplicity to them. How does Apple do it? In terms of the design evolution of the controls, the iPod started out simple, with one large button. It got more complex in middle-generation devices, and in the newest versions, it has oscillated back towards extreme simplicity in design , with all of the buttons now integrated into a single seamless control. With the iPhone and iPod Touch, you can’t even see that control anymore.
So what’s next for technology and design? A lot less thinking about technology for technology’s sake, and a lot more thinking about design. Art humanizes technology and makes it understandable. Design is needed to make sense of information overload. It is why art and design will rise in importance during this century as we try to make sense of all the possibilities that digital technology now affords. Apple’s done it. Others want to follow suit.
Right now, our nation sees left-brain thinking, focused on logic and reasoning, as critical to future economic development. You can see it in the emphasis on the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Math) subjects. What’s missing from STEM is right brain thinking — embodied by what I call the key “IDEA” (Intuition, Design, Emotion, Art). We need both both halves of the brain to work together and channel that brilliance through our hands and propagate ideas throughout our world. We all wonder why Apple’s products have that je ne sais quoi that draw us in. I’m beginning to think that it’s not just that they understand the power of simplicity, or the power of software. It’s that you can see they were born from a person, from two dirty hands, from just a little bit of technology, and from a massively powerful IDEA.
Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-maeda/technology-design-apple_b_291748.html
Also visit John Maeda’s website on business,
simplicity and design: http://lawsofsimplicity.com/

[...] Technology + Design = Apple? « Smartstorming Blog blog.smartstorming.com/2009/09/23/technology-design-apple – view page – cached I wanted to share this recent blog posting by John Maeda, President of the Rhode Island School of Design. John is an inspired thought leader on the subjects of innovation, design and technology. — From the page [...]
[...] This post was Twitted by smartstorming [...]
John,
Nice post on innovative thinking. There is no doubt in my mind that companies and professionals who embrace full brain thinking (left/right) are more successful.
The challenge is that the leadership must have the courage to hold off the purely left brain thinkers driven my immediate $ results. I think the fight is truly between immediate gratification vs. greater potential.
For many left brain thinkers, the delay to reach something different or bigger is scary.
Thanks for this post.
Kate Nasser
We completely agree, Kate. Fortunately (for us and others who work in this area), leadership is increasingly open to exploring the value of innovative thinking to the bottom line. I’m not so sure whether we are actually seeing a new, more evolved generation of leadership, so much as one that is reacting to the economic conditions, general business environment and consumer demands they face every day.
It’s evident that we are in the midst of an era of continual reinvention – and will, more than likely, remain there permanently. Smart managers realize this. They may not know how to do it, but they know they have to in order to succeed.
Thanks so much for your comment!
Keith & Mitchell