RSS .92| RSS 2.0| ATOM 0.3
  • Home
  • About
  • Programs
  • People
  • Contact Us
  •  

    Update: Can Creativity Be Taught?

    April 16th, 2009

    We are thrilled that this question has elicited so much response.

    First, to date, of those who answered the poll, almost 1/2 (47%) believe creativity can be taught, 29% think this is “somewhat” the case (that people can improve their creative ability), 24% feel you’ve either got it or you don’t.

    Perhaps more interesting, however, is the number and variety of responses we received when we posted the question on LinkedIn. In just one day the question received 23 answers from business professionals of all kinds, from different industries. Many were extremely thoughtful and provocative. We hope to use highlights from several in our article.

    In the meantime, I’ll share an original poem offered up by Michael Lyubomirskiy, project manager, consultant and inventor at Lyubomirskiy Consulting.

    Can creativity be taught?
    Debate is endless. All for nought.
    “Self improvement” so much fun
    Run around, but nothing done.
    Geniuses meanwhile left to rot…

    More soon on this topic!

    Share

    Can Creativity Be Taught?

    April 14th, 2009

    In advance of a new article on this topic, we wanted to see what you think? We have our own very definite point of view. What’s yours?

    [polldaddy poll=1537926]

    Share

    Innovate or Perish: The New Darwinism

    March 31st, 2009

    Some time ago, Steve Jobs was quoted as saying, “Innovation distinguishes between a leader and a follower;” and that statement has never been more meaningful than it is today. At a time when the even the most fundamental elements of business success are being reevaluated and redefined, one thing becomes increasingly clear: innovation is no longer a “nice to have;” it’s a “must have.” It’s what we call The Innovation Imperative; if innovation distinguished between leaders and followers in the recent past, today it increasingly distinguishes between survivors and the barely breathing. Innovation is the new Darwinism in business; it’s no longer “survival of the fittest,” but “survival of the most innovative.”

    The choice facing companies today is simple: innovate, or perish. Those that will survive today’s economic environment and succeed in tomorrow’s are those willing to continually reinvent themselves, their products, their brands, their processes-in short, the way they do business. Many organizations are even looking for innovative ways to innovate, replacing traditional brainstorming techniques with new, more inventive processes like SmartStorming and 3-D Ideation. Introduce the world to the new new thing, the bleeding edge technology, the better mousetrap, the reinvented paradigm and there’s a good bet you’ll remain ahead of the curve and be around to reap the rewards in the future.

    The Innovators

    The topic of innovation certainly isn’t new; it’s been the business buzz word for several years now. We’ve all read about it in business magazines and heard the reports on financial news stations. Harvard Business School professors lecture on it at conferences and scores of books address it. And the same companies are consistently held up as the elite innovators-Apple, Google, Nintendo, JetBlue, Toyota, Target (and today again, WalMart). And there are hundreds and even thousands more you’ve never heard of, visionary companies that are  seizing the opportunities (yes, opportunities) presented by the current economic phase, breaking the rules, establishing new standards, delivering incredible value, and  then starting that process all over again…and again, and again. These companies come in all shapes and sizes, and exist in every industry-technology, biotech, pharma, automotive, consumer packaged goods, retail, you name it, they’re out there, outthinking and outdoing everyone else in their fields. Whatever they’re playing field, they all have one thing in common: they innovate.

    Three Not-So-Easy choices

    Today, businesses face three choices. In many cases, none may be easy to make.

    1. Actively innovate. Stay at the forefront of their industry and their competitive set, doing whatever it takes to meet constantly evolving market conditions and consumer demand.

    2. React. Wait for others to set the standard and play catch-up, forever scrambling to match the latest development introduced by market leaders.

    3. Do nothing. Stay right where they are, do their best to survive, and almost certainly stagnate, eventually drifting into irrelevance, and finally, extinction.

    Innovate or perish.

    Innovation of the Individual

    By the way, the innovation imperative doesn’t only apply to businesses; it’s a challenge facing individuals, as well, again, even more so today. Each and every one of us who collects (or hopes to collect) a paycheck has at least one consumer, the person responsible for our professional future. Individual employees must also continually reassess their approach and establish their value, or face the same dismal fate as their corporate counterparts. In fact, while we are currently facing increasing jobless numbers, still more than 90% of the workforce remains employed. While in many cases circumstances beyond the control of the individual are responsible, what might that 10% do, innovatively, that could help them make it back into the 90%?

    Work Your Innovation Chops

    The time to develop an innovation orientation is not tomorrow or next week or in the third quarter. It’s now.

    Begin actively searching for new, better, more productive ways of doing things. Utilize proven innovation tools-advanced ideation techniques, new technologies, breakthrough processes. Adopt an “innovation mindset,” asking yourself every day, “How could I do this better?” Turn yourself and your organization into an Innovation Machine. You will not only survive this evolutionary upheaval, you will thrive.

    Share

    Innovation Spotlight: “Intersection Marketing”

    March 27th, 2009

    There’s a marketing trend we refer to as “Intersection Marketing.” The concept is based on the premise that if one observes life and lifestyles closely, you will notice “sweet spots” where a target audience’s everyday life intersects seamlessly with the ideal promotional opportunity or vehicle. Here is an example of innovative marketing that borders on the transcendent.

    iwc_watch

    Share

    Why do people hate brainstorm sessions?

    March 26th, 2009

    To date, 72% of those who have responded to our survey (see our first blog post dated March 19th) have responded that a typical brainstorming session in their organization is either “pretty much a waste of time,” or worse, “torture.”

    We’re keeping the poll up indefinitely, so if you haven’t voted yet, please do.

    In the meantime, why is it that so many people hate, dread or at the very least, feel ambivalent about brainstorms? What is it about the question, “Anybody got any ideas?” that makes the majority of brainstorm participants cringe?

    In our own research, we find this to be a consistent response across industries. Virtually everyone seems to know that their approach to group idea generation is broken; but they haven’t a clue how to fix it.

    One of the key issues is a lack of established process. Almost by definition, people believe that brainstorm sessions should be “loose.” Too much structure is certain to squash people’s natural creativity, right?

    Wrong. All innovative thinking (creativity, lateral thinking, eureka moments, etc.) takes place within some sort of process.

    The creative genius may appear undisciplined and totally random. But ask any one, and he or she will explain some sort of process — how they seed their thoughts with inspiration, how they set the stage for free association, how they separate the wheat from the chaff, how they develop and expand upon their fledgling ideas. And that’s just a single person, a solitary mind struggling against itself. Put ten such individuals into a room, and the need for a process is even greater. It is naive to think that a group of individuals can effortlessly flow through the process of idea generation and development without some sort of process or structure to guide them.

    Big egos, crippling insecurities, peer pressure, intimidation by senior staffers, shyness, arrogance, fatigue, lack of understanding, too much caffeine, Blackberries and iPhones, last night’s outstanding episode of Mad Men — a thousand different things can turn the best-intentioned brainstorm into a waste of time for participants and a waste of resources for an organization. At their worst, poorly structured and facilitated brainstorm sessions are completely demoralizing and produce no worthwhile concepts.

    So what’s the answer? How can you transform your organization’s ability to generate fresh, innovative ideas, efficiently and consistently, and maybe even enjoy the process?

    First, plan your brainstorming sessions ahead of time, establish a process, create ground rules for participants, and stick with them.

    Second, make sure that anyone running sessions knows and understands the process, and applies it consistently. The best process is worthless if it isn’t applied.

    Finally, educate yourself on the processes, techniques and approaches developed by others. A lot of experienced people have spent a lot of time considering this topic, and developing, testing and implementing systems that work. SmartStorming, of course, is one. (Our favorite!)

    Innovation and the ability to think and act creatively is crucial to any organization, and particularly in today’s unsettled environment. Brainstorms should not be treated as casual, unimportant events. They represent an opportunity for your group to move the organization forward.

    Now, have you got any ideas?

    Share

    Companies In Need Of Innovative Thinking Are Turning To Smartstorming®

    March 23rd, 2009

    A recent news release on SmartStorming.

    Companies In Need Of Innovative Thinking Are Turning To Smartstorming®

    Share

    Creativity…an act of constructing or revealing?

    March 20th, 2009

    michelangelos_david_530Michelangelo said that every piece of stone held within it a great work if art. The artist’s job is simply removing the excess stone to reveal it.

    Is creativity a constructive process, putting pieces together until something new and innovative appears? Or is it more a matter of uncovering that which already exists?

    True innovation is probably some combination of the two. Adding what’s lacking – and removing whatever stands in the way.

    I look forward to any comments you might have. If they get in the way, we’ll remove them. :)

    Share